Laparoscopic Repair of Duodenal Perforation by “Hanging Method” -Technique and Benefits

Authors Information
Article Notes and Dates
To Cite : Babu A, Raikhy A, Ghosh H, Sarathi Nayak P, Bhartia A, et al. Laparoscopic Repair of Duodenal Perforation by “Hanging Method” -Technique and Benefits, J Minim Invasive Surg Sci. 2017 ;6(2):e13964. doi: 10.5812/minsurgery.13964.
Abstract
1. Background
2. Methods
3. Results
4. Discussion
Footnotes
References
  • 1. Zelickson MS, Bronder CM, Johnson BL, Camunas JA, Smith DE, Rawlinson D, et al. Helicobacter pylori is not the predominant etiology for peptic ulcers requiring operation. Am Surg. 2011; 77(8): 1054-60[PubMed]
  • 2. Zittel TT, Jehle EC, Becker HD. Surgical management of peptic ulcer disease today--indication, technique and outcome. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2000; 385(2): 84-96[DOI][PubMed]
  • 3. Sung JJ, Kuipers EJ, El-Serag HB. Systematic review: the global incidence and prevalence of peptic ulcer disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2009; 29(9): 938-46[DOI][PubMed]
  • 4. Bertleff MJ, Lange JF. Perforated peptic ulcer disease: a review of history and treatment. Dig Surg. 2010; 27(3): 161-9[DOI][PubMed]
  • 5. Lau JY, Sung J, Hill C, Henderson C, Howden CW, Metz DC. Systematic review of the epidemiology of complicated peptic ulcer disease: incidence, recurrence, risk factors and mortality. Digestion. 2011; 84(2): 102-13[DOI][PubMed]
  • 6. Bas G, Eryilmaz R, Okan I, Sahin M. Risk factors of morbidity and mortality in patients with perforated peptic ulcer. Acta Chir Belg. 2008; 108(4): 424-7[DOI][PubMed]
  • 7. Vaira D, Menegatti M, Miglioli M. What is the role of Helicobacter pylori in complicated ulcer disease? Gastroenterology. 1997; 113(6 Suppl)-84[DOI][PubMed]
  • 8. Boey J, Choi SK, Poon A, Alagaratnam TT. Risk stratification in perforated duodenal ulcers. A prospective validation of predictive factors. Ann Surg. 1987; 205(1): 22-6[DOI][PubMed]
  • 9. Hermansson M, Stael von Holstein C, Zilling T. Surgical approach and prognostic factors after peptic ulcer perforation. Eur J Surg. 1999; 165(6): 566-72[DOI][PubMed]
  • 10. Rajesh V, Chandra SS, Smile SR. Risk factors predicting operative mortality in perforated peptic ulcer disease. Trop Gastroenterol. 2003; 24(3): 148-50[PubMed]
  • 11. Buck DL, Moller MH, Danish Clinical Register of Emergency S. Influence of body mass index on mortality after surgery for perforated peptic ulcer. Br J Surg. 2014; 101(8): 993-9[DOI][PubMed]
  • 12. Mouret P, Francois Y, Vignal J, Barth X, Lombard-Platet R. Laparoscopic treatment of perforated peptic ulcer. Br J Surg. 1990; 77(9): 1006[DOI][PubMed]
  • 13. Lau H. Laparoscopic repair of perforated peptic ulcer: a meta-analysis. Surg Endosc. 2004; 18(7): 1013-21[DOI][PubMed]
  • 14. Siu WT, Leong HT, Law BK, Chau CH, Li AC, Fung KH, et al. Laparoscopic repair for perforated peptic ulcer: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg. 2002; 235(3): 313-9[DOI][PubMed]
  • 15. Song KY, Kim TH, Kim SN, Park CH. Laparoscopic repair of perforated duodenal ulcers: the simple "one-stitch" suture with omental patch technique. Surg Endosc. 2008; 22(7): 1632-5[DOI][PubMed]
  • 16. Sanabria A, Villegas MI, Morales Uribe CH. Laparoscopic repair for perforated peptic ulcer disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013; (2)[DOI][PubMed]
  • 17. Bertleff MJ, Halm JA, Bemelman WA, van der Ham AC, van der Harst E, Oei HI, et al. Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open repair of the perforated peptic ulcer: the LAMA Trial. World J Surg. 2009; 33(7): 1368-73[DOI][PubMed]
  • 18. Bertleff MJ, Lange JF. Laparoscopic correction of perforated peptic ulcer: first choice? A review of literature. Surg Endosc. 2010; 24(6): 1231-9[DOI][PubMed]
  • 19. Kim JH, Chin HM, Bae YJ, Jun KH. Risk factors associated with conversion of laparoscopic simple closure in perforated duodenal ulcer. Int J Surg. 2015; 15: 40-4[DOI][PubMed]
  • 20. Wright GP, Davis AT, Koehler TJ, Scheeres DE. Cost-efficiency and outcomes in the treatment of perforated peptic ulcer disease: laparoscopic versus open approach. Surgery. 2014; 156(4): 1003-7[DOI][PubMed]
  • 21. Shelat VG, Ahmed S, Chia CL, Cheah YL. Strict Selection Criteria During Surgical Training Ensures Good Outcomes in Laparoscopic Omental Patch Repair (LOPR) for Perforated Peptic Ulcer (PPU). Int Surg. 2015; 100(2): 370-5[DOI][PubMed]
  • 22. Kuwabara K, Matsuda S, Fushimi K, Ishikawa KB, Horiguchi H, Fujimori K. Community-based evaluation of laparoscopic versus open simple closure of perforated peptic ulcers. World J Surg. 2011; 35(11): 2485-92[DOI][PubMed]
  • 23. Thorsen K, Glomsaker TB, von Meer A, Soreide K, Soreide JA. Trends in diagnosis and surgical management of patients with perforated peptic ulcer. J Gastrointest Surg. 2011; 15(8): 1329-35[DOI][PubMed]
  • 24. Gurusamy K, Aggarwal R, Palanivelu L, Davidson BR. Systematic review of randomized controlled trials on the effectiveness of virtual reality training for laparoscopic surgery. Br J Surg. 2008; 95(9): 1088-97[DOI][PubMed]
  • 25. Moorthy K, Munz Y, Dosis A, Bello F, Chang A, Darzi A. Bimodal assessment of laparoscopic suturing skills: construct and concurrent validity. Surg Endosc. 2004; 18(11): 1608-12[DOI][PubMed]
Creative Commons License Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 4.0 International License .

Search Relations:

Author(s):

Article(s):

Create Citiaion Alert via Google Reader

Cited By:

Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgical Sciences accepts terms & conditions of:

International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) Citedby Linking DOI enabled Crossref iThenticate COPE Cross Check